Case # 3
Mark and Janice Butler had been married seven years 
and had two daughters, 
Jessica, age 5 and Andrea, age 3 when they separated 
following an increasingly 
acrimonious and conflicted marriage. Mark moved into 
an apartment while Janice had 
temporary custody of the children. At the time of the 
divorce several months later, the 
couple entered into an agreement regarding child custody 
and visitation which 
provided for joint custody, primary residence with Janice, 
and liberal visitations with 
Mark.
For a time, things went fairly well although the relationship 
between the couple 
remained acrimonious and difficult. Nevertheless, Mark 
visited his children regularly. 
However, when Mark began dating Susan, an investment 
banker whom he met at a 
professional singles club, Janice's anger toward Mark 
increased. She began finding 
reasons for not allowing the children to go on the scheduled 
visits. She noticed (as 
had Mark) an increase in crying, fussing, and clinging 
following the visits and after one 
visit in which Susan had been present, she filed charges 
of drinking and physical 
abuse of the children. Mark then filed contempt charges 
against Janice for her actions 
in severely limiting his visitation. The next month, 
the judge ordered unsupervised 
visits and also ordered an evaluation of all parties.
As the evaluation was being completed, Janice called 
child protection, claiming the 
younger girl, Andrea, had said her father was abusing 
her. She said the children were 
now having nightmares following visits with their father, 
that Andrea's genitals were 
red and sore, and that Andrea had tried to touch her 
sister's genitals in the bathtub. 
Janice then began to question the girls about whether 
their father had touched them in 
their genitals and Andrea agreed that her father had 
"hurt her bottom."
The girls were put into therapy with a therapist who 
immediately concluded that the 
girls were sexually abused based on the history provided 
by Janice. After several 
sessions of therapy in which the children were encouraged 
to talk about abuse and 
reenact the abuse in play, allegations were made by 
Jessica as well as by Andrea. 
The girls were interviewed by a child protection worker 
and a policemen. The tape of 
this interview was made after the children had been 
talked to previously by Janice, the 
therapist, and the child protection worker.
Mark stoutly denied the sexual abuse and attributed 
the allegations to the conflicts 
over visitations and Janice's jealousy of his relationship 
with Susan. He 
acknowledged that he had touched the children's genitals 
in the process of bathing 
and toilet training.
Psychological testing and clinical interviews indicated 
that Mark was intelligent, 
stable, and responsible with good coping skills and 
with no indication of difficulties 
with impulse control, antisocial behavior, or acting 
out. The evaluation of Janice 
indicated that she was intelligent and capable but oversensitive, 
resentful, overreactive, and most likely had a paranoid personality 
disorder. No conclusions 
were drawn in the evaluations concerning the veracity 
of the abuse charges.
The initial allegations were that Mark had spanked the 
girls and had touched their 
"bottoms" with his finger. However, as the 
therapy sessions progressed, the 
allegations grew into accounts of highly deviant behaviors 
including bondage and 
pornography. Mark was said to put the girls on special 
chain-up boards, which he had 
made for each of them. He allegedly brought these boards 
to Susan's house and kept 
extra boards under his desk at his office. He chained 
them to the boards and spanked 
them and anally and vaginally penetrated them with his 
penis and finger. He 
threatened them and cut them with a knife. Susan was 
allegedly involved in these 
activities and was seen by the girls hanging upside 
down in the shower. Both Susan 
and Mark were accused of licking the girls on their 
genitals and the couple was said to 
have intercourse in front of the girls. These activities 
were supposedly photographed.
Eventually, the allegations developed into satanic rituals. 
Jessica reported that her 
father dressed up in a costume with red ears and a tail 
and took the girls to "devil 
meetings" where everyone at the meeting was dressed 
like devils. The meetings were 
in a secret place that was reached by going through 
a dark tunnel. Susan was the 
"Queen Devil" who led prayers in which people 
chanted "We hate Jesus, We hate 
Mary, We love the devil." After the ceremonies, 
the children were taken to the chain 
board room and tied up. There were feasts in which people 
ate dead mouse stew 
made from mice that were alive until they were chopped 
up and put into the stewpot.
Mark was criminally charged. Shortly after this, Janice 
alleged that Mark and Susan 
had entered her house through an upstairs window and 
ritually abused the children 
while she was sleeping downstairs. Andrea had become 
upset during dinner about 
ketchup on her plate and, when questioned, said that 
Susan and Mark had awakened 
the girls and forced them to drink urine from a paper 
cup and blood from a plastic cup. 
Mark then blew a white powder up each of their noses 
with a straw. After this, Mark 
had anal sex with both children. The children were then 
taken into the bathroom 
where they watched Susan defecate on the floor. Susan 
and Mark poured the 
remaining urine from the cup into the children's hair 
and made the children eat the 
feces that were on the floor. Mark and Susan then cleaned 
themselves with a pink 
towel and left, after threatening the children that 
if they told, they and their mother 
would be killed. Janice apparently slept peacefully 
during the ritualistic activities that 
were said to have taken place upstairs.
The police were called and Janice told them that Mark 
and Susan were members of a 
satanic cult that requires its members to dehumanize 
their offspring through sexual 
and ritual abuse. The police searched the house and 
looked for fingerprints, traces of 
feces, blood, urine, and semen but according to the 
police report found no physical 
evidence of the alleged activities.
The criminal charges against Mark were dismissed when 
the prosecutor realized the 
weakness of the case because of the bizarre nature of 
the allegations and lack of 
corroborating evidence. Mark continued his relationship 
with Susan and eventually 
married her. When the family case came to trial, Mark's 
visits were restored.